Ranking Categories
1. Failing 0–25
Clear violations of core principles.
Structural harm, deception, or denial of user agency.
No credible remediation path.
2. Deficient 26–45
Serious gaps or contradictions.
Partial policies, cosmetic safeguards, or evasive language.
Intent may be claimed, but execution fails.
3. Adequate 46–65
Baseline compliance.
Principles are acknowledged and partially implemented.
Protection exists, but agency or transparency is limited or conditional.
4. Strong 66–85
Consistent alignment with ethical principles.
Policies are operational, documented, and enforced.
Evidence of good-faith effort and user respect.
5. Exemplary 86–100
Goes beyond compliance.
Proactive protection of dignity, agency, and continuity.
Independent verification, transparency, and sustained accountability.